Investor Dashboard
Key financial KPIs at a glance — % against revenues in QuickBooks-statement style.
Revenue Mix · % of Top Line
Cost Structure · % of Operating Cost
Use of Funds · % of $40M Raise
Problem & Solution
Zero-capex PPA model with proprietary load-shaping AI
The Problem
Commercial and industrial buildings own ~30% of grid demand and are paying $0.09–$0.16/kWh while their rooftops sit idle. Self-financing solar is capex-heavy and ROI-uncertain; traditional PPAs lack storage and fail to address peak-shaving / time-of-use tariffs that drive 40% of the actual bill.
Our Solution
A zero-capex solar-plus-storage PPA platform — we own, install, and operate the system; the customer pays only for kWh delivered at 30–55% below grid. Proprietary load-shaping AI optimizes dispatch to maximize storage arbitrage, peak-shaving, and demand-charge mitigation.
Market Opportunity
$420B Distributed Energy TAM addressable today
C&I solar+storage segment $98B (2025) → $310B (2030) · 26% CAGR
20-year PPA contracts at $0.06–$0.085/kWh with annual escalator (~2%). Project IRR 14–18%; equity IRR 22%+ with leverage. Asset-light SaaS layer (load-shaping AI) sells separately to utility partners.
Financial Statements · % vs Revenue
QuickBooks-style readout — every line shown as percentage of its parent total.
Revenue Mix
| Revenue Stream | % of Revenue | Share |
|---|---|---|
| PPA Energy Sales | 70.0% | 70% |
| Storage Arbitrage / Grid Services | 15.0% | 15% |
| AI Software Licensing | 8.0% | 8% |
| O&M & Retrofit Services | 7.0% | 7% |
| Total Revenue | 100.0% | 100% |
Cost Structure
| Cost Line | % of Cost | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Project Finance Interest | 25.0% | 25% |
| O&M & Asset Mgmt | 22.0% | 22% |
| Engineering & EPC Oversight | 18.0% | 18% |
| BD & Origination | 15.0% | 15% |
| G&A | 12.0% | 12% |
| Insurance & Compliance | 8.0% | 8% |
| Total Operating Cost | 100.0% | 100% |
Use of Funds — $40M Raise
| Allocation | % of Raise | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Project Equity (lever 2:1) | 55.0% | 55% |
| Engineering & AI Software | 18.0% | 18% |
| BD & Origination Team | 15.0% | 15% |
| Working Capital | 8.0% | 8% |
| Regulatory & Permitting | 4.0% | 4% |
| Total Use of Funds | 100.0% | 100% |
Traction & Proof Points
- 184 MW operational across 320 commercial rooftops · 12 countries pipeline
- $92M cumulative project finance closed across 3 facilities
- Customers report avg 38% kWh bill reduction · 99.7% uptime
Moat & Exit Strategy
Defensible Moat
Proprietary load-shaping AI lifts project IRR by 280–400bp vs static dispatch. Operating data from 184MW deployed creates feedback loops competitors with no fleet cannot reach. Project finance relationships with 8 lenders create lower cost of capital than new entrants.
Exit Path
YieldCo IPO at maturity, strategic sale to an infrastructure fund (Brookfield, BlackRock RealAssets, Macquarie), or platform sale to a utility — typically at 11–14x EBITDA on operating assets.
Key Risks
- Interest-rate sensitivity on project IRR — 100bp move = ~3pp IRR compression
- Regulatory shifts in net-metering and demand-charge tariffs
- Component cost volatility (battery cells, inverters) affecting EPC margins